Theorem
In mathematics and formal logic, a theorem is a statement that has been proven, or can be proven.
At a glance
Key signals
0% cross fields · reaches 1 more
- Mathematics
- Logic
- Explanation
- Examples
- Misconception
- Sourced relations 4
- Attribution
Dependencies
What this concept builds on and what it makes possible — derived from the atlas’s dependency, causal and structural relations, not from every related edge.
Foundations · builds on
Theoremdepends onAxiomEstablished
theorem depends on axiom.
Mechanism: A theorem ultimately depends on axioms: it is a truth derived by pure logic from the starting assumptions a system accepts.
- Wikipedia (English & German editions) verifiedmoderate evidence
Enables · leads to
Mathematical proofdepends onTheoremEstablished
mathematical proof depends on theorem.
Mechanism: A proof may build on earlier theorems: already-established results become tools in the chain of reasoning for a new one.
- Wikidata verifiedmoderate evidence
System context
Mathematical proofis part ofTheoremEstablished
mathematical proof is part of theorem.
Mechanism: A theorem is a statement together with its proof: the proof is the rigorous argument that establishes the theorem as true.
- Wikidata verifiedmoderate evidence
Pythagorean theoremis aTheoremEstablished
Pythagorean theorem is a kind of theorem.
Mechanism: The Pythagorean theorem is a proven result: in a right triangle, the square on the longest side equals the sum of the squares on the other two.
- Wikipedia (English & German editions) verifiedmoderate evidence
Structural role & consequence
Interpreted from the current atlas graph — what the connections mean, not just how many there are.
Currently dark in the atlas: no key date stored · 4 of 4 of its relations lack claim-level evidence.
atlas representation · Describes the current Thinking OS representation, not the state of the world.
Builds on 1 foundation (requires / depends-on / derived-from / emerges-from).
structural · Structural graph analysis — not a claim of importance, causation or history.
All 3 of its relationships stay within its own discipline — a field-specific concept in the current atlas.
structural · Structural graph analysis — not a claim of importance, causation or history.
cross-field
3 within-field, 0 cross-field
Strengths & constraints
Constraints
- Evidence coverage currently thin in the atlas — few of its relationships carry claim-level evidence. atlas representation
- No dated history stored — the atlas records no key date for this concept. atlas representation
Conditions
- Its dependency reading rests on 1 foundation relation. structural
- Read structurally — most of its relationships carry no external evidence yet, so claims here are graph-derived. structural
Dependency radial
What this concept builds on (left) and what it makes possible (right) — derived from dependency and causal relations.
What builds on this
1 concept build on this directly, 1 in total, across 2 disciplines.
Structural downstream reach along dependency edges — not a claim of historical necessity.
Seen through each discipline
How this concept sits in each of its fields — derived from its real connections in the graph, not asserted.
Through this lens it connects to Axiom, Mathematical proof, Mathematical proof and Pythagorean theorem.
Through this lens it connects to Axiom, Mathematical proof and Mathematical proof.
Related ideas to explore
Concepts that look related but are not yet connected here — candidates for a connection to reason about, not established links.
- Connects 3 other ideas across 2 disciplines.
- Most of its connections are of the “Kind & structure” kind.
Derived from the graph’s real structure — observations, not a score.
Sources
- Wikipedia (English & German editions) verifiedmoderate evidence
- Wikidata verifiedmoderate evidence
- Priestley duality, a Sahlqvist theorem and a Goldblatt-Thomason theorem for positive modal logic (1999) verified
- Formalizing a Modal Logic for CCS in the HOL Theorem Prover (1993) verified
- A unified proof of Brooks’ theorem and Catlin’s theorem (2015) verified
- Introduction. The Krein-Milman theorem as an integral representation theorem verified