Possible Worlds
Possible worlds are complete ways things could have been, used to analyse claims about necessity and possibility.
At a glance
Key signals
0% cross fields · reaches 0 more
- Metaphysics
- Explanation
- Examples
- Misconception
- Sourced relations
- Attribution
Structural role & consequence
Interpreted from the current atlas graph — what the connections mean, not just how many there are.
Currently dark in the atlas: no key date stored · 1 of 1 of its relations lack claim-level evidence.
atlas representation · Describes the current Thinking OS representation, not the state of the world.
All 1 of its relationships stay within its own discipline — a field-specific concept in the current atlas.
structural · Structural graph analysis — not a claim of importance, causation or history.
cross-field
1 within-field, 0 cross-field
Strengths & constraints
Constraints
- Evidence coverage currently thin in the atlas — few of its relationships carry claim-level evidence. atlas representation
- No dated history stored — the atlas records no key date for this concept. atlas representation
Conditions
- Read structurally — most of its relationships carry no external evidence yet, so claims here are graph-derived. structural
Seen through each discipline
How this concept sits in each of its fields — derived from its real connections in the graph, not asserted.
Related ideas to explore
Concepts that look related but are not yet connected here — candidates for a connection to reason about, not established links.
- Connects 1 other ideas across 1 discipline.
- Most of its connections are of the “Explains & models” kind.
Derived from the graph’s real structure — observations, not a score.
Sources
- The Metaphysics of Meaning: Propositions and Possible Worlds (2010) verified
- Possible worlds (2020) verified